Disney‘s current strategic direction under CEO Bob Iger got the thumbs-up from independent proxy voting and corporate governance advisory firm Glass Lewis, amid a campaign launched by two activist investor groups to win seats on the Mouse House’s board.
Glass Lewis, in a March 18 report, recommended Disney shareholders vote for the Disney-selected 12 director nominees — and reject those put forward by Nelson Peltz‘s Trian Partners and another firm, Blackwells Capital — at the company’s annual meeting on April 3.
Disney “is undertaking what we consider to be a credible effort to shift key operational priorities under the leadership of one of the most well-respected CEOs in the industry,” Glass Lewis said in the report, referring to Iger. “[W]e consider the subsequent 15 months [since Iger’s return as CEO] have provided management and an incrementally reconstituted board with adequate opportunity to launch a more credible succession program and develop, communicate and execute on several key initiatives which appear to reasonably target acknowledged operational and financial weaknesses at Disney.”
Glass Lewis also said, “While it remains too early to say with certainty that each of those programs will prove successful, we believe it is similarly too early to suggest there exists adequate cause for investors to support alternate solicitations which may prove significantly less accretive to Disney’s trajectory, by comparison.”
Trian has been lobbying Disney investors to vote in Peltz and Jay Rasulo, former CFO at Disney, at the annual shareholders meeting. In a recent letter to Disney investors, Trian said, “Shareholders can’t afford another boom-and-bust sequel.” The hedge fund acknowledged, “After 10 years of poor performance, Disney’s stock is up in the first two months of 2024.” But Trian’s letter questioned whether the company can execute on recent announced strategic plans and said that “without the pressure of our proxy contest pushing Disney to perform, it is unclear if the ‘announcements’ would have been made.”
In its report, Glass Lewis said that “given what we believe is already a credible plan underway for Disney, we struggle to see many of Trian’s intentions as representing a likely net gain for investors.” The firm continued, “Notwithstanding faults in Disney’s prior succession initiative, Trian’s intent to launch a new process is not clearly superior to, and may be heavily duplicative of, Disney’s ongoing effort, which is already tied to a special board committee composed of members we believe to be credible.”
SEE ALSO: Disney Grandchildren Slam Activist Investors in Letters to Company Shareholders: ‘We Know Who the Villains Are in This Story’
Blackwells Capital, which owns a relatively small number of Disney shares, and supports Iger’s leadership is urging Disney shareholders to vote for its own three candidates (Jessica Schell, a former Warner Bros. and NBCUniversal exec; Tribeca Film Festival co-founder Craig Hatkoff; and TaskRabbit founder Leah Solivan).
Disney has previously said it opposes the candidates nominated by Trian and Blackwells as lacking “the appropriate range of talent, skill, perspective and/or expertise,” and is urging shareholders to vote for its own 12 nominees.
Disney chairman Mark Parker said in a statement, “We are pleased that Glass Lewis recognizes the strength of our highly qualified nominees and supports our plans to return this iconic company to a period of sustained growth and shareholder value creation. In its recommendation, Glass Lewis clearly identifies the strength of the diverse skillsets across our board nominees, the credibility of our succession planning process and recent changes to the board and compensation program and the promise of our recent efforts to bolster growth and value creation to position Disney for the future.”
Glass Lewis, in commenting on Disney’s current governance practices, succession planning efforts, and the experience and engagement of the current Disney board, said: “We note the board has demonstrated a willingness to refresh its membership in the service of shareholder responsiveness and skill reconstitution with some reasonable regularity, resulting in an average tenure of less than five years across the incumbent slate.”
Disney said in a statement: “In contrast to our highly qualified nominees and their successful track record, in our view, the alternate nominees [from Trian and Blackwells] do not bring additive skills or qualifications to the Disney board and have no unique, meaningful plan to deliver superior shareholder value.”
Source link
