A new lawsuit challenges a government fee rule that would raise immigration filing costs for many … [+]
A new lawsuit challenges a government fee rule that would raise immigration filing costs for many employers. If successful, the litigation could save companies significant sums compared to the projected costs under a final rule published by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on January 31, 2024. The fees in the rule become effective April 1, 2024.
The Rule Would Impose Significant Fee Increases On Employers
Under the rule, employers will pay 70% more for beneficiaries on H-1B petitions, 201% more for employees on L-1 petitions and 129% more for individuals on O-1 petitions. USCIS will also charge employers a new $600 Asylum Program Fee when filing a Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, or Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker. The agency will also raise the H-1B Electronic Registration Fee for each beneficiary from $10 to $215.
Lynden Melmed of BAL projects that the firm’s larger clients should expect higher filing fees in the first year to raise costs by 115% to 175%. (The USCIS website includes a list of the new fees.)
The National Foundation for American Policy estimates most companies will spend approximately $9,400 to petition for a first-time H-1B visa holder under the new fee rule, assuming premium processing and average attorney fees.
Filing an extension for an H-1B professional would raise the costs for most employers to about $18,000. (USCIS often requires extensions when H-1B employees change locations, not just after three years in H-1B status.)
Over the past two decades, employers have paid more than $6 billion in H-1B fees to fund approximately 100,000 scholarships for U.S. students in science and technology fields and job training for U.S. workers, according to the NFAP analysis.
Challenging The Fee Rule
The lawsuit challenges several aspects of the final rule. “The Final Rule should be enjoined preliminarily and permanently because it was promulgated without appropriate notice and comment, arbitrarily forces certain businesses and individuals, but not all, to fund asylum adjudications, and unlawfully imposes fee increases of 100% or higher on foreign investors seeking immigrant status based on the creation of jobs for United States workers without first completing the fee study Congress ordered prior to changing fees,” according to a lawsuit filed March 19, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado in the Tenth Circuit.
The plaintiffs are the ITServe Alliance, an employer group, the American Immigrant Investor Alliance and Samantha Moody, a Canadian citizen and EB-5 investor. The plaintiffs’ attorneys are Jonathan Wasden of Wasden Law, Jesse M. Bless of Bless Litigation LLC and Matthew T. Galati of the Galati Law Firm, LLC.
The complaint states the lawsuit does not intend “to derail Defendants, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), and Ur M. Jaddou, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), from charging reasonable fees for the adjudication of immigration benefits,” but to “to ensure Defendants promulgate a rule in accordance with law and procedure.”
The plaintiffs’ complaint makes three arguments. First, it states that the final rule “is unlawful because it was promulgated without adequate notice and comment.” According to the complaint, the final rule contravenes the Administrative Procedure Act because it “does not adequately provide the terms or substance of the Proposed Rule, or a description of the subjects and issues involved” and “fails to give persons adequate opportunity to participate in the rulemaking.”
Second, “The Final Rule is unlawful because it arbitrarily and in excess of statutory authority imposes an ‘Asylum Program Fee’ that taxes certain categories of petitioners for employment-based immigration benefits between $300 to $600 per benefit request to fund DHS’s asylum program.”
Third, “The Final Rule doubles immigrant investor fees through the EB-5 program in violation of law,” according to the complaint. “In the Final Rule, USCIS imposed new fees on immigrant investors and regional centers without completion of the fee study and statutory principles of the RIA [EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022].”
DHS and USCIS argued when publishing the final rule that it conformed to the Immigration and Nationality Act and “non-statutory guidance” and “accounts for, and is consistent with, congressional appropriations for specific USCIS programs.”
The fees will go into effect on April 1, 2024, unless a judge grants the plaintiffs’ motion for a request for a preliminary injunction.
Source link
